In a series of papers the above authors examined the relationship between the universal and elementary theory of a group ring R[G] and the corresponding universal and elementary theory of the associated group G and ring R. Here we assume that R is a commutative ring with identity 1 ≠ 0. Of course, these are relative to an appropriate logical language L0, L1, L2 for groups, rings and group rings respectively. Axiom systems for these were provided. Kharlampovich and Myasnikov, as part of the proof of the Tarskii theorems, prove that the elementary theory of free groups is decidable. For a group ring they have proved that the first-order theory (in the language of ring theory) is not decidable and have studied equations over group rings, especially for torsion-free hyperbolic groups. We examined and survey extensions of Tarksi-like results to the collection of group rings and examine relationships between the universal and elementary theories of the corresponding groups and rings and the corresponding universal theory of the formed group ring. To accomplish this we introduce different first-order languages with equality whose model classes are respectively groups, rings and group rings. We prove that if R[G] is elementarily equivalent to S[H] then simultaneously the group G is elementarily equivalent to the group H and the ring R is elementarily equivalent to the ring S with respect to the appropriate languages. Further if G is universally equivalent to a nonabelian free group F and R is universally equivalent to the integers ℤ then R[G] is universally equivalent to ℤ[F] again with respect to an appropriate language. It was proved that if R[G] is elementarily equivalent to S[H] with respect to L2, then simultaneously the group G is elementarily equivalent to the group H with respect to L0, and the ring R is elementarily equivalent to the ring S with respect to L1.
The structure of group rings is related to the Kaplansky zero-divisor conjecture. A Kaplansky group is a torsion-free gorup which satisfies the Kaplansky conjecture. We next show that each of the classes of left-orderable groups and orderable groups is a quasivariety with undecidable theory. In the case of orderable groups, we find an explicit set of universal axioms. We have that 𝒦 the class of Kaplansky groups is the model class of a set of universal sentences in the language of group theory. We also give a characterization of when two groups in 𝒦 or more generally two torsion-free groups are universally equivalent.
Finally we consider F to be a rank 2 free group and ℤ be the ring of integers. we call ℤ[F] a free group ring. Examining the universal theory of the free group ring ℤ[F] the hazy conjecture was made that the universal sentences true in ℤ[F] are precisely the universal sentences true in F modified appropriately for group ring theory and the converse that the universal sentences true in F are the universal sentences true in ℤ[F] modified appropriately for group theory. We prove that this conjecture is true in terms of axiom systems for ℤ[F].
This is joint work with Anthony Gaglione, Martin Kreuzer, Gerhard Rosenberger and Dennis Spellman
This video is part of the New York Group Theory Cooperative‘s group theory seminar series.
