I will talk about the development of the theory of polynomial identities initiated by important questions such as Burnside's asking if every finitely generated torsion group is finite. The field was enriched by contributions of many great mathematicians. Most notably Lie rings methods were developed and used by Zelmanov in the 1990s to give a positive solution to the restricted Burnside problem which awarded him the Fields medal. It has been of great interest to expand the theory to other varieties of algebraic structures. In particular, I will review when a group algebra or enveloping algebra satisfy a polynomial identity.
Seminars in Group Rings
In the seventies, Feldman and Moore studied Cartan pairs of von Neumann algebras. These pairs consist of an algebra A and a maximal commutative subalgebra B with B sitting "nicely" inside of A. They showed that all such pairs of algebras come from twisted groupoid algebras of quite special groupoids (in the measure theoretic category) and their commutative subalgebras of functions on the unit space, and that moreover the groupoid and twist were uniquely determined (up to equivalence). Kumjian and Renault developed the C*-algebra theory of Cartan pairs. Again, in this setting all Cartan pairs arise as twisted groupoid algebras, this time of effective etale groupoids, and again the groupoid and twist are unique (up to equivalence).
In recent years, Matsumoto and Matui exploited this to give C*-algebraic characterizations of continuous orbit equivalence and flow equivalence of shifts of finite type using graph C*-algebras and their commutative subalgebras of continuous functions on the shift space (which form a Cartan pair under mild assumptions on the graph). The key point was translating these dynamical conditions into groupoid language. The ring theoretic analogue of graph C*-algebras are Leavitt path algebras. Leavitt path algebras are also connected to Thompson's group V and some related simple groups considered by Matui and others. Since the Leavitt path algebra associated to a graph is the "Steinberg" algebra of the same groupoid (a ring theoretic version of groupoid C*-algebras whose study was initiated by the speaker), this led people to wonder whether these dynamical invariants can be read off the pair consisting of the Leavitt path algebra and its subalgebra of locally constant maps on the shift space. The answer is yes, and it turns out in the algebraic setting one doesn’t even need any conditions on the graph. Initially work was focused on recovering a groupoid from the pair consisting of its "Steinberg" algebra and the algebra of locally constant functions on the unit space. But no abstract theory of Cartan pairs existed and twists had not yet been considered. Our work develops the complete picture.
It turns out that a twist on a groupoid gives rise to a Cartan pair when the algebra satisfies a groupoid analogue of the Kaplansky unit conjecture. In particular, if the groupoid has a dense set of objects whose isotropy groups satisfy the Kaplansky unit conjecture (e.g., are unique product property groups or left orderable), then the groupoid gives rise to a Cartan pair. This is what happens in the case of Leavitt path algebras where the isotropy groups are either trivial or infinite cyclic and hence left orderable.
In a series of papers the above authors examined the relationship between the universal and elementary theory of a group ring R[G] and the corresponding universal and elementary theory of the associated group G and ring R. Here we assume that R is a commutative ring with identity 1 ≠ 0. Of course, these are relative to an appropriate logical language L0, L1, L2 for groups, rings and group rings respectively. Axiom systems for these were provided. Kharlampovich and Myasnikov, as part of the proof of the Tarskii theorems, prove that the elementary theory of free groups is decidable. For a group ring they have proved that the first-order theory (in the language of ring theory) is not decidable and have studied equations over group rings, especially for torsion-free hyperbolic groups. We examined and survey extensions of Tarksi-like results to the collection of group rings and examine relationships between the universal and elementary theories of the corresponding groups and rings and the corresponding universal theory of the formed group ring. To accomplish this we introduce different first-order languages with equality whose model classes are respectively groups, rings and group rings. We prove that if R[G] is elementarily equivalent to S[H] then simultaneously the group G is elementarily equivalent to the group H and the ring R is elementarily equivalent to the ring S with respect to the appropriate languages. Further if G is universally equivalent to a nonabelian free group F and R is universally equivalent to the integers ℤ then R[G] is universally equivalent to ℤ[F] again with respect to an appropriate language. It was proved that if R[G] is elementarily equivalent to S[H] with respect to L2, then simultaneously the group G is elementarily equivalent to the group H with respect to L0, and the ring R is elementarily equivalent to the ring S with respect to L1.
The structure of group rings is related to the Kaplansky zero-divisor conjecture. A Kaplansky group is a torsion-free gorup which satisfies the Kaplansky conjecture. We next show that each of the classes of left-orderable groups and orderable groups is a quasivariety with undecidable theory. In the case of orderable groups, we find an explicit set of universal axioms. We have that 𝒦 the class of Kaplansky groups is the model class of a set of universal sentences in the language of group theory. We also give a characterization of when two groups in 𝒦 or more generally two torsion-free groups are universally equivalent.
Finally we consider F to be a rank 2 free group and ℤ be the ring of integers. we call ℤ[F] a free group ring. Examining the universal theory of the free group ring ℤ[F] the hazy conjecture was made that the universal sentences true in ℤ[F] are precisely the universal sentences true in F modified appropriately for group ring theory and the converse that the universal sentences true in F are the universal sentences true in ℤ[F] modified appropriately for group theory. We prove that this conjecture is true in terms of axiom systems for ℤ[F].
Three conjectures on group rings of torsion-free groups are commonly attributed to Kaplansky, namely the unit, zero divisor and idempotent conjectures. For example, the zero divisor conjecture predicts that if K is a field and G is a torsion-free group, then the group ring K[G] has no zero divisors. I will survey what is known about the conjectures, including their relationships to each other and to other conjectures and group properties, and finish with my recent counterexample to the unit conjecture.
Kaplansky made various related conjectures about group rings, especially for torsion-free groups. For example, the zero divisors conjecture predicts that if K is a field and G is a torsion-free group, then the group ring K[G] has no zero divisors. I will survey what is known about the conjectures, including their relationships to each other and to other group properties such as orderability, and present some recent progress.
The theory of small cancellation groups is well known. In this paper we introduce the notion of Group-like Small Cancellation Ring. This is the main result of the paper. We define this ring axiomatically, by generators and defining relations. The relations must satisfy three types of axioms. The major one among them is called the Small Cancellation Axiom. We show that the obtained ring is non-trivial. Moreover, we show that this ring enjoys a global filtration that agrees with relations, find a basis of the ring as a vector space and establish the corresponding structure theorems. It turns out that the defined ring possesses a kind of Gröbner basis and a greedy algorithm. Finally, this ring can be used as a first step towards the iterated small cancellation theory which hopefully plays a similar role in constructing examples of rings with exotic properties as small cancellation groups do in group theory. Joint results with A. Kanel-Belov, E. Plotkin, E. Rips.
