How do we describe the topology of the space of all nonconstant holomorphic (respectively, algebraic) maps F: X → Y from one complex manifold (respectively, variety) to another? What is, for example, its cohomology? Such problems are old but difficult, and are nontrivial even when the domain and range are Riemann spheres. In this talk I will explain how these problems relate to other parts of mathematics such as spaces of polynomials, arithmetic (e.g., the geometric Batyerv-Manin type conjectures), algebraic geometry (e.g., moduli spaces of elliptic fibrations, of smooth sections of a line bundle, etc) and if time permits, homotopy theory (e.g., derived indecomposables of modules over monoids). I will show how one can fruitfully attack such problems by incorporating techniques from topology to the holomorphic/algebraic world (e.g., by constructing a new spectral sequence).
Tag - Algebraic topology
We prove a variant of Quillen's stratification theorem in equivariant homotopy theory for a finite group working with arbitrary commutative equivariant ring spectra as coefficients, and suitably categorifying it. We then apply our methods to the case of Borel-equivariant Lubin-Tate E-theory. In particular, this provides a computation of the Balmer spectrum as well as a cohomological parametrization of all localizing tensor-ideals of the category of equivariant modules over Lubin-Tate theory, thereby establishing a finite height analogue of the work of Benson, Iyengar, and Krause in modular representation theory.
Many cohomology theories in algebraic geometry, such as crystalline and syntomic cohomology, are not homotopy invariant. This is a shame, because it means that the stable motivic homotopy theory of Morel-Voevodsky cannot be employed in studying the deeper aspects of such theories, such as cohomology operations that act on the cohomology groups. In this talk, I will discuss ongoing efforts, joint with Ryomei Iwasa and Marc Hoyois, to set up a workable theory of non-homotopy invariant stable motivic homotopy theory, with the goal of providing effective tools of studying cohomology theories in algebraic geometry by geometric means.
The derived category, D(A), of the category Mod(A) of modules over a ring A is an important example of a triangulated category in algebra. It can be obtained as the homotopy category of the category Ch(A) of chain complexes of A-modules equipped with its standard model structure. One can view Ch(A) as the category Fun(Q, Mod(A)) of additive functors from a certain small preadditive category Q to Mod(A). The model structure on Ch(A) = Fun(Q, Mod(A)) is not inherited from a model structure on Mod(A) but arises instead from the "self-injectivity" of the special category Q. We will show that the functor category Fun(Q, Mod(A)) has two interesting model structures for many other self-injective small preadditive categories Q. These two model structures have the same weak equivalences, and the associated homotopy category is what we call the Q-shaped derived category of A. We will also show that it is possible to generalize the homology functors on Ch(A) to homology functors on Fun(Q, Mod(A)) for most self-injective small preadditive categories Q.
Projective modules over rings are the algebraic analogues of vector bundles; more precisely, they are direct summands of free modules. Some rings have non-free projective modules. For instance, the ideals of a number ring are projective, and for some number rings they need not be free. Even for rings like ℤ, over which all finitely generated projective modules are free, the category of such modules contains a wealth of interesting information. In this talk I will introduce algebraic K-theory, which encodes this information. I will also explain why one would try to use some kind of trace from K-theory to simpler invariants, outline the cyclotomic trace and briefly show how it is used in calculations.
The lower central series of a group G is defined by γ1=G and γn = [G,γn-1]. The 'dimension series', introduced by Magnus, is defined using the group algebra over the integers:
δn = { g : g-1 belongs to the nth power of the augmentation ideal }.
It has been, for the last 80 years, a fundamental problem of group theory to relate these two series. One always has δn ≥ γn, and a conjecture by Magnus, with false proofs by Cohn, Losey, etc., claims that they coincide; but Rips constructed an example with δ4 / γ4 cyclic of order 2. On the positive side, Sjogren showed that δn / γn is always a torsion group, of exponent bounded by a function of n. Furthermore, it was believed (and falsely proved by Gupta) that only 2-torsion may occur.
In joint work with Roman Mikhailov, we prove however that every torsion abelian group may occur as a quotient δn / γn; this proves that Sjogren's result is essentially optimal.
Even more interestingly, we show that this problem is intimately connected to the homotopy groups πn(Sm) of spheres; more precisely, the quotient δn / γn is related to the difference between homotopy and homology. We may explicitly produce p-torsion elements starting from the order-p element in the homotopy group π2p(S2) due to Serre.
In the 1980s, Mahowald and Kane used Brown-Gitler spectra to construct splittings of bo ⋀ bo and BP⟨1⟩ ⋀ BP⟨1⟩. These splittings helped make it feasible to do computations using the bo- and BP⟨1⟩-based Adams spectral sequences. In this talk, we will discuss an analogous splitting for BP⟨2⟩ ⋀ BP⟨2⟩ at primes larger than 3.
I'll talk about the tmf-based Adams spectral sequence, and how it detects most of the v2-periodic elements in the known range of the 2-primary stable stems. Parts of the material I will discuss are joint with Dominic Culver, Prasit Bhattacharya, JD Quigley, and Mark Mahowald.
Sheaves sit at an interface of algebra and geometry. Equivariant sheaves offer even more structure, allowing for different group actions at different stalks. We are interested in the case where both the base space and group of equivariance are profinite (that is, compact, Hausdorff and totally disconnected). This combination provides many useful consequences, such as a good notion of equivariant presheaves and an explicit construction of infinite products.
The 2019 PhD thesis of Sugrue used equivariant sheaves to give an algebraic model for rational G-equivariant stable homotopy theory, where G is profinite. In this talk I will explain the model and related results, such as the equivalence between equivariant sheaves and rational Mackey functors (for profinite G).
The Brown Comenetz dual I of the sphere represents the functor which on a spectrum X is given by the Pontryagin dual of the 0-th homotopy group of X. For a prime p and a chromatic level n there is a K(n)-local version In of I. For a type n-complex X, this is given by the Pontryagin dual of the 0-th homotopy group of the K(n)-localization of X. By work of Hopkins and Gross, the homotopy type of the spectra In for a prime p is determined by its Morava module if p is sufficiently large. For small primes, the result of Hopkins and Gross determines In modulo an "error term". For n=1 every odd prime is sufficiently large and the case of the prime 2 has been understood for almost 30 years. For n>2 very little is known if the prime is small. For n=2 every prime bigger than 3 is sufficiently large. The case p=3 has been settled in joint work with Paul Goerss. This talk is a report on work in progress with Paul Goerss on the case p=2. The "error term" is given by an element in the exotic Picard group which in this case is an explicitly known abelian group of order 29. We use chromatic splitting in order to get information on the error term.

You must be logged in to post a comment.