In my talk I would like to discuss my joint articles with S. Sierra about the primitive ideals of universal enveloping U(W) and the symmetric algebra S(W) of Witt Lie algebra W and similar Lie algebras (including Virasoro Lie algebra). The key theorem in this setting is that every nontrivial quotient by a two-sided ideal of U(W) or S(W) has finite Gelfand-Kirillov dimension. Together with Sierra we enhanced this statement to the description of primitive Poisson ideals of S(W) in terms of certain points on the complex plane plus a few parameters attached to these points. In the end I will try to explain how all these concepts works for the ideals whose quotient has Gelfand-Kirillov dimension 2.
Tag - Non-associative rings
In this talk we will present recent results on the category of finite-dimensional modules for map superalgebras. Firstly, we will show a new description of certain irreducible modules. Secondly, we will use this new description to extract homological properties of the category of finite-dimensional modules for map superalgebras, most importantly, its block decomposition.
We say that an element x in a ring R is nilpotent last-regular if it is nilpotent of certain index n+1 and its last nonzero power xn is regular von Neumann, i.e., there exists another element y∈R such that xnyxn=xn. This type of elements naturally arise when studying certain inner derivations in the Lie algebra Skew(R,∗) of a ring R with involution ∗ whose indices of nilpotence differ when considering them acting as derivations on Skew(R,∗) and on the whole R. When moving to the symmetric Martindale ring of quotients Qms(R) of R we still obtain inner derivations with the same indices of nilpotence on Qms(R) and on the skew-symmetric elements Skew(Qms(R),∗) of Qms(R), but with the extra condition of being generated by a nilpotent last-regular element. This condition strongly determines the structure of Qms(R) and of Skew(Qms(R),∗). We will review the Jordan canonical form of nilpotent last-regular elements and show how to get gradings in associative algebras (with and without involution) when they have such elements.
The title matches that of a series of papers by various authors beginning in 1997, whose goal was the study and classification of such algebras over fields of positive characteristic. The original motivation came from group theory: the Leedham-Green and Newman coclass conjectures on pro-p groups from 1980 had all become theorems relatively recently, and subsequent results of Shalev and Zelmanov had raised interest in what one could say about Lie algebras of finite coclass. In positive characteristic, the simplest case of coclass one (i.e., 'Lie algebras of maximal class', also called 'filiform' in some quarters) appeared challenging even under the strong assumptions of those Lie algebras being infinite-dimensional and graded over the positive integers. I will review motivations and results of those studies, including some classifications obtained by Caranti, Newman, Vaughan-Lee. Then I will describe some generalizations recently established with three of my former PhD students.
The problem of determining centralizers in the enveloping algebras of Lie algebras is considered from both the algebraic and analytical perspectives. Applications of the procedure, such as the decomposition problem of the enveloping algebra of a simple Lie algebra, the labelling problem, and the construction of orthonormal bases of states are considered.
We say that a Lie ring R is called a unique addition Lie ring, or briefly a UA-Lie ring, if any commutator-preserving bijection on R preserves the addition as well. We prove that any semisimple Lie algebra and any its parabolic subalgebra is a UA-Lie ring. Also we describe wide classes of solvable UA-Lie rings.
In recent joint work with D. Nakano, an analogue 𝒩 of the nilpotent cone was constructed for classical simple Lie superalgebras, and 𝒩 was shown to consist of only finitely many nilpotent orbits. In this talk, we determine several geometric properties such as the dimension and irreducibility of 𝒩 for the Lie superalgebra 𝔤𝔩(m|n), and we give a more detailed description of the geometry and structure of the nilpotent orbits in this case. We also demonstrate connections between our nilpotent orbit representatives and certain signed Young diagrams appearing in the work of Kraft and Procesi.
Rota-Baxter operators on Lie algebras were first studied by Belavin, Drinfeld and Semenov-Tian-Shansky as operator forms of the classical Yang-Baxter equation. Integrating the Rota-Baxter operators on Lie algebras, we introduce the notion of Rota-Baxter operators on Lie groups and more generally on groups. Then the factorization theorem can be achieved directly on groups. We introduce the notion of post-Lie groups, whose differentiations are post-Lie algebras. A Rota-Baxter operator on a group naturally induces a post-group. Post-groups are also closely related to operads, braces, Lie-Butcher groups and various structures.
Pre-Calabi-Yau algebras were introduced in the last decade by M. Kontsevich, A. Takeda and Y. Vlassopoulos using the necklace bracket. This notion is equivalent to a cyclic A∞-algebra for the natural bilinear form in the finite-dimensional case. Moreover, W-K. Yeung showed that double Poisson DG structures provide an example of pre-Calabi-Yau structures. In 2020, D. Fernandez and E. Herscovich proved that given a morphism of double Poisson DG algebras from A to B, one can produce a cyclic A∞-algebra and A∞-morphisms between the latter and the cyclic A∞-algebras associated to A and B. I will explain how to generalize this result to pre-Calabi-Yau algebras by doing an explicit construction of a (cyclic) A∞-algebra and A∞-morphisms given a pre-Calabi-Yau morphism.
The so-called Lvov-Kaplansky Conjecture states that the image of a multilinear polynomial evaluated on the matrix algebra or order n is always a vector subspace. A solution to this problem is known only for n=2. In this talk we will present analogous conjectures for other associative and non-associative algebras and for graded algebras. Also, we will show how we can use gradings to present a statement equivalent to the Lvov-Kaplansky conjecture.

You must be logged in to post a comment.